<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ratio, Michael Ruhlman &#124; 2009 &#124; US</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegastronomersbookshelf.com/546_ratio-michael-ruhlman-2009-us-full/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegastronomersbookshelf.com/546_ratio-michael-ruhlman-2009-us-full</link>
	<description>collaborative book reviews about all things food and wine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:56:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: September cooking group &#171; From Rednecklandia to the Emerald City</title>
		<link>http://www.thegastronomersbookshelf.com/546_ratio-michael-ruhlman-2009-us-full/comment-page-1#comment-2350</link>
		<dc:creator>September cooking group &#171; From Rednecklandia to the Emerald City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegastronomersbookshelf.com/?p=546#comment-2350</guid>
		<description>[...] To quote a review of the book from the Gastronomer’s Bookshelf [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To quote a review of the book from the Gastronomer’s Bookshelf [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.thegastronomersbookshelf.com/546_ratio-michael-ruhlman-2009-us-full/comment-page-1#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegastronomersbookshelf.com/?p=546#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Looks like a good review, but I haven&#039;t read the book yet, but a copy is on the way.  

Just wondering if the author had any suggestions on where one could find information on this tradition of ratios that he mentions in the review - are there older books on the subject? Somewhere in Escoffier probably!?

I think I&#039;m going to make my own diagrams and charts from the information in the book. : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a good review, but I haven&#8217;t read the book yet, but a copy is on the way.  </p>
<p>Just wondering if the author had any suggestions on where one could find information on this tradition of ratios that he mentions in the review &#8211; are there older books on the subject? Somewhere in Escoffier probably!?</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m going to make my own diagrams and charts from the information in the book. : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mochachoc</title>
		<link>http://www.thegastronomersbookshelf.com/546_ratio-michael-ruhlman-2009-us-full/comment-page-1#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>mochachoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegastronomersbookshelf.com/?p=546#comment-414</guid>
		<description>I think this is a fair appraisal of the book.  I was enthusiastic about buying this book after reading Ruhlman&#039;s blog.  I was also relieved that someone had the good sense to encourage cooks to move beyond the recipe. However, after reading an excerpt on Amazon I was befuddled.  Not only is there a glaring mistake (3% of 1000 grams is 30 not 3 as stated in the book. An oversight the editors need a spanking for) but as you mentioned for non-American readers it is almost unintelligible.  That said I look forward to an edition with the mistakes ironed out and marketed to those who don&#039;t know what a stick of butter is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a fair appraisal of the book.  I was enthusiastic about buying this book after reading Ruhlman&#8217;s blog.  I was also relieved that someone had the good sense to encourage cooks to move beyond the recipe. However, after reading an excerpt on Amazon I was befuddled.  Not only is there a glaring mistake (3% of 1000 grams is 30 not 3 as stated in the book. An oversight the editors need a spanking for) but as you mentioned for non-American readers it is almost unintelligible.  That said I look forward to an edition with the mistakes ironed out and marketed to those who don&#8217;t know what a stick of butter is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

